NOTE: as per banteg’s suggestion below (see the comments) the snapshot vote has been remade to reflect the correct intentions of the proposal and include the relevant correct contract address of Yearn vaults. This is to make sure the community has complete transparency of the technical flow. Please revote for GIP-3.
Thank you, apologies for including the wrong ones! Do you think this prompts re-making snapshot or would you say this editorial notice is fine as is? I assume people vote with the assumption for the most relevant version, but arguing this way is a dangerous rabbit hole (pun intended). Wdyt?
Tried to copy pasta the contents but the site wouldn’t allow me to repost
tl;dr : please add CRV tricrypto2 pool as it offers the largest volume, modest 18% APR on Convex in addition to having exposure to both BTC and ETH making it a very attractive pool to leverage.
NOTE: as per banteg’s suggestion below (see the comments) the snapshot vote has been remade to reflect the correct intentions of the proposal and include the relevant correct contract address of Yearn vaults. This is to make sure the community has complete transparency of the technical flow. Please revote for GIP-3.
For what it’s worth I think it is acceptable to allow the multisig to have some level of discretion, while being very sensitive to any dissent. Ultimately a multi-sig is not a full blown DAO and we don’t need to pretend it is all the time (but it’s still helpful to treat it as one as much as possible to ease / speed up the eventual goal of/transition to a truly decentralized organization).